Traditional consulting reviews run long and end in opinions
The review records what was observed, why it matters, and what should be verified next.
Private equity technical diligence
Understand the codebase risk before you commit.
A 30-day codebase and architecture assessment for software investors, working with read-only access and strict target confidentiality.
Start the 30-day assessmentTechnical assessment30 daysFixed scopeRead-only access · evidence register · executive readout
Decision support, not theater
Translate technical evidence into questions the deal team can act on.
We focus on material codebase, architecture, dependency, testing, security, licensing, and delivery concerns. Findings are tied to evidence and uncertainty is stated plainly.
Management interviews cannot verify hidden code and dependency risk
The review records what was observed, why it matters, and what should be verified next.
Findings need to translate into specific ownership and remediation questions
The review records what was observed, why it matters, and what should be verified next.
What the deal team receives
Concise outputs with an evidence trail.
Codebase risk scorecard
Maintainability, dependency, security, licensing, testing, and delivery observations organized by materiality.
Evidence register
Each finding tied to observable code, configuration, architecture, or repository evidence.
Executive readout
Decision-relevant risks, open questions, and post-close priorities presented without false precision.
What we provide30day assessment
Thirty days with read-only access under strict confidentiality. Investors finish with evidence-backed findings and a post-close roadmap.
Start a 30-day assessment Fixed scope · read-only access · written findings you keepA 30‑day technical assessment. Six answers in writing.
Where the codebase stands
Maintainability, architecture, dependencies, security, licensing, and testing, each tied to observable evidence.
What can be done about it
Which findings matter to the deal, which are routine, and what remediation realistically involves.
Which tools will help
Engineering and AI tooling that would raise delivery speed and quality after close.
What to improve in the process
How the team ships today, where delivery risk sits, and which practices to change first.
How to upgrade legacy components
The parts of the platform that will need modernization, and a sensible order to tackle them.
How long it takes, and the roadmap
A post-close technical roadmap with durations and priorities the operating team can own.
Week by week
What happens in each of the four weeks.
Kickoff and scope
We walk you through our in-house analysis system, which scans your code, repositories, and databases, and agree exactly what the assessment will cover and what you will receive.
- Scope, systems, and people agreed
- What you will get: architecture, workflows, recommendations, timeline, risks
- A go or no-go decision before any access is given
NDA, access, and the scan
Once you are ready to proceed, we sign an NDA and you grant read-only access to the necessary repositories and databases. Then our system runs.
- NDA signed, read-only access granted
- Data lineage traced across code and databases
- Workflows and dependencies identified
Verify and weigh the options
Senior engineers verify what the system found in working sessions with your team, and capture what is not written down anywhere.
- Findings confirmed or corrected with your people
- Options, tools, and process fixes compared
- Legacy upgrade paths tested against your constraints
Roadmap and readout
You receive the written findings and we walk the decision makers through them.
- Overall architecture and workflow documentation
- Recommendations and risks, in priority order
- Timeline and roadmap for the work
2 free PDFs · Specification + sample report
See exactly what the 30 days deliver.
We email you the 2-page specification and a 13-page sample report written for a fictional company: findings, options compared, recommended tools, target architecture, risks, and a 40-week roadmap.
- Assessment specification
- 13-page sample report
- Architecture, risks, roadmap
Who is behind AICO Services
Built and delivered by Trobus Technologies.
A Maryland-based engineering company. AICO Services is how we package our AI automation, modernization, and assessment work. Our engineers have delivered for organizations including these.
Organizations represented in the broader Trobus Technologies delivery history. Engagement scope and team role vary; reference details are shared where authorized.
Delivery recordRepresentative production engineering record. Details available where authorized.
4systems in production4 yrscontinuous operation990+automated tests1,361commitsCompany qualifications
Credentials maintained by Trobus Technologies, LLC
MBE
Minority Business Enterprise
MDOT
Maryland DOT certified
SBA WOSB
Woman-Owned Small Business
WOSB
Women-Owned Small Business
E-Verify
Participating employer
30-day assessment
Start a 30-day assessment Need technical clarity before you commit?
Share the timeline and access constraints. We’ll confirm whether the 30-day assessment fits before requesting materials.