Where your project stands
An honest status of the application, process, or initiative: what works, what is fragile, and what nobody has written down.
We build AI workflows and agents that hold up in production, modernize the legacy systems in their way, and assess software for investors. Every engagement starts with a 30-day assessment, so you know where you stand before you commit.
Every engagement starts the same way. A 30-day assessment tells you where the project stands, what your options are, and how long the work will take.
Before anyone proposes a build, we spend thirty days inside your systems and process. You finish with a clear picture of where you stand and a roadmap you can act on, with us or with anyone else.
Start a 30-day assessment Fixed scope · read-only access · written findings you keepAn honest status of the application, process, or initiative: what works, what is fragile, and what nobody has written down.
Practical options with trade-offs, including doing less than you planned or nothing at all.
The AI, automation, and engineering tools that fit your stack and team, and the ones that would be hype for your case.
Where handoffs, approvals, and ownership slow the work down, independent of any technology.
If you want it: a path from the older system to a modern one without a big-bang cutover.
A phased plan with durations, dependencies, and decision points for the migration or modernization work.
We walk you through our in-house analysis system, which scans your code, repositories, and databases, and agree exactly what the assessment will cover and what you will receive.
Once you are ready to proceed, we sign an NDA and you grant read-only access to the necessary repositories and databases. Then our system runs.
Senior engineers verify what the system found in working sessions with your team, and capture what is not written down anywhere.
You receive the written findings and we walk the decision makers through them.
A Maryland-based engineering company. AICO Services is how we package our AI automation, modernization, and assessment work. Our engineers have delivered for organizations including these.










Organizations represented in the broader Trobus Technologies delivery history. Engagement scope and team role vary; reference details are shared where authorized.
Credentials maintained by Trobus Technologies, LLC

Minority Business Enterprise

Maryland DOT certified

Woman-Owned Small Business

Women-Owned Small Business

Participating employer
Workflows on n8n, Zapier, Make, and custom code. Agents with a defined job, limits, and tests. Every build is measured against the work it replaced.
We design and build AI-powered workflows with n8n, Zapier, Make, and custom code, so requests, documents, and decisions move on their own while people stay in control of the exceptions.
We build narrowly scoped agents with defined tools, guardrails, evaluations, and human handoff, so they complete a job your team can measure instead of impressing a meeting.
We capture information from forms, documents, inboxes, and partner systems, validate it, and move it into the right business tools with human review only where judgment is needed.
We build internal assistants that answer questions from your policies, contracts, tickets, and manuals, respect who may see what, cite their sources, and say so when they do not know.
We use AI to read legacy code, extract business rules, draft documentation, and generate tests, with senior engineers verifying every finding. Then we integrate, wrap, or replace only what blocks you.
We look at the process and the tools around it, then tell you in writing what is worth building, with what, and in which order.
No vague transformation program. We choose a valuable workflow, define how it should operate, ship it safely, and prove whether it helped.
Observe the real workflow, quantify repetitive effort, identify failure points, and choose the highest-value place to begin.
Define triggers, decisions, data movement, human review, exceptions, ownership, and success measures before implementation.
Deliver a production workflow in small testable increments, connected to the tools your team already uses.
Track time saved, errors prevented, throughput, reliability, and adoption—then improve what the evidence supports.
Software development, data engineering, machine learning, cloud infrastructure, and security are supporting capabilities. We bring in only what the workflow needs, and we say so when AI is not the answer.
Start with the 30-day assessmentIf clearer rules, cleaner data, or better ownership should come before automation or modernization, the assessment says so in writing.
We email you the 2-page specification and a 13-page sample report written for a fictional company: findings, options compared, recommended tools, target architecture, risks, and a 40-week roadmap.
Thirty days of evidence costs less than one quarter of building the wrong thing.
Look for work that is repetitive, frequent, rule-driven, and measurable—especially when it requires copying data, checking statuses, assembling reports, or moving information between tools.
Usually not. We first look for safe ways to connect the tools you already use. Replacement is considered only when the existing system makes reliability or change unnecessarily difficult.
AI is useful for reading, extracting, classifying, summarizing, drafting, and narrowly scoped agent work. It is hype when it has no defined job, no limits, and no way to measure quality. Deterministic rules, human review, and audit history stay around important decisions.
Yes. We design around your current tools, security requirements, cloud environment, data constraints, and team capabilities.
We work inside your systems and process with read-only access. You receive six written answers: where the project stands, what you can do about it, which tools will help, what to improve in the process, how to upgrade the legacy system if you want to, and how long the work takes with a roadmap.
n8n, Zapier, Make, and Power Automate for workflows, Claude and OpenAI models for AI steps and agents, and custom code where volume, testing, or cost demands it. The assessment recommends what fits and says why.
Three quick choices—no email, no submission, and no information leaves your browser.
Status, options, tools, process fixes, an upgrade path, and a roadmap with durations. It starts with a conversation about scope.